If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For is it dangerous to live near a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.